Grand Canyon – NRS 410V Week 5 Complete Work

NRS 410V Grand Canyon Week 5 Complete Work

NRS410V

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion

The case scenario provided will be used to answer the discussion questions that follow.

Case Scenario

Mr. C., a 32-year-old single man, is seeking information at the outpatient center regarding possible bariatric surgery for his obesity. He reports that he has always been heavy, even as a small child, but he has gained about 100 pounds in the last 2-3 years. Previous medical evaluations have not indicated any metabolic diseases, but he says he has high blood pressure, which he tries to control with sodium restriction and sleep apnea. He current works at a catalog telephone center.

Objective Data

Height: 68 inches; Weight 134.5 kg
BP: 172/96, HR 88, RR 26
Fasting Blood Glucose: 146/mg/dL
Total Cholesterol: 250mg/dL
Triglycerides: 312 mg/dL
HDL: 30 mg/dL

Critical Thinking Questions

What health risks associated with obesity does Mr. C. have? Is bariatric surgery an appropriate intervention? Why or why not?
Mr. C. has been diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease and the following medications have been ordered: (a) Magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide (Mylanta) 15 mL PO 1 hour before bedtime and 3 hours after mealtime and at bedtime; (b) Ranitidine (Zantac) 300 mg PO at bedtime; and (c) Sucralfate / Carafate 1 g or 10m1 suspension (500mg / 5mL) 1 hour before meals and at bedtime.

The patient reports eating meals at 7 a.m., noon, and 6 p.m., and a bedtime snack at 10 p.m. Plan an administration schedule that will be most therapeutic and acceptable to the patient.

Assess each of Mr. C.’s functional health patterns using the information given (Hint: Functional health patterns include health-perception – health management, nutritional – metabolic, elimination, activity-exercise, sleep-rest, cognitive-perceptual, self-perception – self-concept, role-relationship, sexuality – reproductive, coping – stress tolerance).
What actual or potential problems can you identify? Describe at least five problems and provide the rationale for each.

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment Latest

Details:

Identify a research or evidence-based article that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention or new diagnostic tool for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children.

In a paper of 750-1,000 words, summarize the main idea of the research findings for a specific patient population. Research must include clinical findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to diabetes and the nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Details:

Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project-Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:

A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless othenvise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Benchmark Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes

Unsatisfactory 0-71%

0.00%

Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%

75.00%

Satisfactory 76-79%

79.00%

Good 80-89%

89.00%

Excellent 90-100%

100.00%

80.0% Content

30.0% Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified.
Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.

Research or evidence-based article not identified.

Research or evidence-based article identified but does not
address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.

Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses
on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.

Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses
on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.

Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses
on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive
manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.

50.0% Summary of Article Includes the Following Content:
Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to
Nursing Practice.

Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements
stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of
the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of
the overall program subject.

Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in
the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic
principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are
described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but
incomplete.

Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or
irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles.
Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack
development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.

Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are
clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows
careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships.
Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues
stated in the assignment criteria.

Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information
beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity
through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough,
current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment
criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and
development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound
research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit
together.

15.0% Organization and Effectiveness

5.0% Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed
and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained
within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the
purpose of the paper clear.

5.0% Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established.
Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is
disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical
progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of
organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show
some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each
other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is
apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic
sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and
transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence
construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure,
and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of
speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written,
academic English.

5.0% Format

3.0% Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language
use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of ‘primer
prose’ indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them
inappropriately.

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice
(register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech
to communicate clearly.

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions,
figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are
appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

2.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error.